The ranges below are starting points. Final pricing depends on workflow complexity, channels, integrations, and whether the right first move is voice, training, or workflow automation.
The audit is still the cleanest first move when the actual bottleneck is not obvious yet.
Initial
$2,500-$5,000
Ongoing
None
A fixed-scope Intake and Workflow System Audit to map the current process, identify the bottleneck, and define the clearest first system to build.
Best first step when the problem is real but the right build is not obvious yet.
Initial
$7,500-$15,000
Ongoing
None
One focused implementation sprint for the first system that matters most, built around your current tools and launched with documentation.
Best when you already know where work is getting stuck and want the first fix shipped.
Initial
Scoped
Ongoing
$1,000-$2,500/mo
Ongoing optimization, support, and expansion after the first system is live and the team wants help improving the next layer.
Use this only when there is real active optimization or expansion work, not a placeholder retainer.
We focus on business automations where work enters through calls, forms, inboxes, or internal requests and the next step is still too manual. That includes follow-up, routing, intake, support, internal admin work, and the workflow layer around your current tools. Publicly, the site now explains the offer through concrete pages like AI Voice Agents, Lead Follow-Up Automation, AI Marketing Systems, AI Tool Training, and Business Automations.
Yes. AI training is a real separate offer for teams that need help using tools like Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex, Manus, or similar systems. Training is not a replacement for workflow automation. It sits alongside the public offer model when the team needs enablement, adoption support, or practical hands-on instruction.
The intake and workflow audit can move quickly because it is a fixed-scope review. Implementation speed depends on the workflow, the number of channels, and how many systems need to be connected. Jorvek scopes the work before building so the timeline and deliverables are clear up front.
Usually yes. Jorvek tries to fit the solution into your current stack before recommending replacement. If a form, phone path, CRM, shared inbox, support flow, or knowledge base is part of the problem, that gets addressed directly instead of forcing a full rebuild.
No. Sometimes a CRM is part of the answer, but the first priority is usually routing, ownership, and the next action. Jorvek works with what you already have or recommends something simple when the current setup cannot support the workflow cleanly. The first fix is often workflow automation, not another platform.
Yes, when the workflow, compliance needs, and communication channel make sense. Lead follow-up automation, missed-call recovery, automated email, SMS, internal notifications, and routing rules are all possible parts of the setup.
Yes. Those are all common service-system patterns when teams need faster handling of recurring customer or internal requests. Jorvek can design support automation, AI voice, self-service, and knowledge-grounded service workflows when the use case is bounded and practical.
You get a workflow map, the highest-priority bottleneck, and a direct recommendation for the first system to build. If there is a fit, Jorvek can turn that into a bounded implementation sprint instead of a vague ongoing engagement. If the bigger need is enablement rather than build work, Jorvek can also recommend training as the right next step.
Describe what's breaking in the workflow and Jorvek will come back with a direct read on fit, scope, and cost. No vague package pitch required.